Photo credits: Expert Infantry
Security at airports around the world was stepped up after September 11, 2001. After terrorists slammed airplanes into skyscrapers in New York City – not to mention the Pentagon – governments began scrambling for ways to make air travel safer. While a lot of innovations have been come up with over the last decade, there’s one that’s likely going to become used more in the future – a move that could reduce the patrol forces necessary at airports.
Pros and Cons of Retina Scans
Let’s start by looking at some of the various pros and cons of retina scans in airports. These specific benefits and negatives will help you understand why this is such a complex topic that a lot of governments are having to deal with on a daily basis. Whatever is decided, there’s no denying that there are both pros and cons to retina scans at airports.
Con – Loss of personal freedom is one negative that a lot of people mention when talking about retina scans at the airport. You already have to supply a photo identification, so why take it to the next level some people wonder.
Pro – On the positive side of the coin, retina scans may be able to speed up the security lines at airports and also increase the accuracy of identifying people who shouldn’t be flying the friendly skies.
Con – Retina scans might also end up being a huge hassle that costs taxpayers a lot of money. From the equipment needed to the people who need to be trained to use the equipment, the cost can add up quickly.
Pro – At the same time, it may be found that retina scans actually decrease the cost of keeping airports safe. This wouldn’t be able to be determined until the system was actually put in place, but these days it’s looking more and more like a possibility.
Will retina scans totally replace human security guards at airports? Of course not, but it’s likely the technology is going to be continued to be used more in order to make sure people on a watchlist are not able to travel via planes. This may or may not cut down on terrorism in the sky, but one thing is for certain – it will likely be fought by many people who believe in freedom.
Where do you stand on the issue? Leave a comment below and let us know your thoughts on retina scans at the airport. Are they needed or merely an invasion of privacy? Whether you agree with them or not, we’d love to hear from you about what you think. If enough people stand up and say they shouldn’t be used at all, it might be possible to stop them from becoming commonplace at airports around the globe. What do you think?